Warpath said:
LOL - Cheers. I'm with ya.
Bah, it ended up being a bust. The buzz wore off somewhere midway while watching a taped episode of Mythbusters with my family. I gotta admit, for a brief while my 9 month old son was just funny as all heck. But this is getting off topic...
Your points make total sense. I wonder if the old style shock is still being produced. For that matter, would Ford care that things were mismatched if there were changes to the internals on the new part, rendering them incompatible with an older car? But yes, I'm right there with you on the importance of matching suspension components.
This afternoon, I did think of a possible solution to a comment I made in another thread, about how sometimes it's hard to diagnose a suspension problem on a high performance automobile. I am wondering if disconnecting the sway bars would help identify a bad shock. This way, there would be no way the shock on the other side of the car might help stabilize the car through the stiffness of the sway bar. I believe this is what has made shock diagnosis so terribly difficult on my Trans Ams, and has forced me to take butt-o-meter sensitivity to silly heights.
SergntMac: your offer of your shocks is very intriguing but before I take any action I need to get to the bottom of whether something did change on a valving basis with the Marauder's shocks. If what I am experiencing is due to some difference between early 2003 and late 2003 valving, replacing my MM#2's shocks with identical vintage units might not help me, if my shocks happen to be in good shape. What kind of mileage are on your units?
As I mentioned to a few others via PM, I just need to clean up the heavy swirls on the paint and get the suspension tightened up, and this car will be absolute heaven to drive (yes, to the point of not even needing aftermarket calibrations, even though I still think the stock shift schedules are gay).