BillyGman said:
I've tried to be as honest as possible with this post. No phoney sugar coating, and no disrespect intended. Just my plain opinion and viewpoint. If you don't agree, then that's your perogative to disagree if you so choose.
Billy...... It is YOUR FAULT I have a Marauder.... (just thought I'd throw that in here)
I agree with all you posted above. I was thinking very similar things as I sat here downing my morning Cheerios and getting ready to resume my install of 0105.
I have several points I want to make....
1. From a purely scientific aspect the "experiment" called the Darkside was invalid. The way the alternate board was presented, the disclaimers, the very name established the fact that the board was going to be an anything goes board. Much the same as a disclaimer on a porno site makes it very clear that you aren't risking seeing a "little skin" you are going to see some very graphic pictures. So, I believe some of the people posting on the Darkside are, by nature, as crass as they came across, others were just briefly "letting their hair down" in the spirit of the moment. So I don't believe the experiment is a vindication of the LEVEL of moderation we have here, only an example of how extreme it MIGHT be if we had no moderation.
2. Groups, clubs, society in a whole are self-regulating. If a member of a group conducts themselves in a manner that is unacceptable by the group, the group censors them. The problem member is ignored, asked to leave, given the cold shoulder, etc. Different groups have different levels of tolerance for individuals that push the boundaries of acceptable behavior. However, this dynamic doesn't work quite as well online. The anonymity associated with the virutal world breeds conduct that wouldn't normally happen in the physical world. Additionally, we have how many people transit this site and we don't even know they were here? This board is not a closed community in the same sense that a group in the physical world is. So it does require different means to enforce the "group norm". The moderators provide this different means. If they are too strict, we do have a way to address it with them or vote with our virtual feet if we aren't comfortable with it. There are other options (SVTPERFORMANCE.COM for example) however, the folks that stay here do so because it is a community that functions, in a large part, the way they like it to function. We have police here to guide wayward members just as we do in physical world.
3. I do think we could use some form of Feedback forum to address different issues concerning vendors or transactions between members etc. I don't think this should be threatening to a business. A transaction between two entities witnessed by the community, is a very easy way to see who was telling the real deal. A reputable business or transaction is only vidicated by such visibility.
4. Finally, on any board, with or without rules, I think folks need to remember that there are / should be consequences tied to their conduct. In this venue it is easy to missunderstand the tone in a written communication. However, unlike real life, you don't have to make a reply or choose an option in fractions of seconds. Some one that is in your virtual face / virtual physical space is not a REAL threat to you. There is plenty of time to think out the whole process, the consequences for courses of action etc. I think some people forget this when buffered by the anonymity provided by the virtual world, or in a real sense the physical buffer. I simply cannot imagine some of the things said in this medium would actually be said face to face! I cannot help but believe that the interaction that took place on the Darkside will forever taint my impression of some of the people based upon their conduct. I wonder how it has affected other folks and their future interaction.
Summary, I won't say that I enjoyed the experiment. I think that it served a purpose, but more for the moderators than for the membership. It was the picture that was worth a thousand moderator words to show us the potential for anarchy that exists in an unmoderated environment. Yet, to an extent I think it was the "easy way out". As an analogy, when you explain to your child why they shouldn't touch a hot burner on the stove, you spend a lot of words, but you don't grab their hand on put it on a hot burner. Obviously the latter action will certainly make the message very clear! But it isn't what you would do. So I think the Darkside was putting people's hand on the burner. I am not sure we needed to do that as justification for level of moderation we have on this board.
These opinions are mine... (perhaps I can pass them off as Billy's

). Your mileage may vary!