No more "On The Rack?"
- Thread starter Donny Carlson
- Start date
- Status
"Y'all tell me what you think. If the majority here feels I’m out of line being ticked-off...I’ll gladly be on my way."
I don't know who's 100% out of line or who's 100% right. I've been lucky enough over the years to have met and hung out with most of the "9" and TAF. Can't say enough nice things about all of them. I don't have a dog in this fight. I don't want you to leave, Todd. I want y'all all to work it out. If that can't happen- we've lost something here.:depress:
I don't know who's 100% out of line or who's 100% right. I've been lucky enough over the years to have met and hung out with most of the "9" and TAF. Can't say enough nice things about all of them. I don't have a dog in this fight. I don't want you to leave, Todd. I want y'all all to work it out. If that can't happen- we've lost something here.:depress:
B
bigslim
Guest
I have a feeling there will be more losses.
BruteForce
Stooge Certified
Kinda funny with all the fur flying over here no one's noticed that you've got RockBlocker (not a vendor) holding court about his protective lens cover kits several posts down. 
I hope you stay Todd. Vendor or not. On the Rack or not.
I hope you stay Todd. Vendor or not. On the Rack or not.
TooManyFords
Action figures sold separately
My best and final offer...
I may be going out on a limb, but here's the deal...
I'll buy MM.NET from the current 9 for the price they paid for it, in full by the end of the week. I'll correct the problems and get this train back on the tracks. I'll remove vendor fees, open the system up and run it all out of my pocket.
I'll leave a "tip" jar on the counter in case anyone feels the need.
You see, I made my first million by GIVING software away. It used to be called SHAREWARE. I never required anyone to pay anything. I encouraged everyone to give a copy to their friend. And you know what? It worked!
I'll make MM.NET Shareware. I'll make everyone happy again.
No hidden agendas, just friends.
You can PM me your offer.
john
I may be going out on a limb, but here's the deal...
I'll buy MM.NET from the current 9 for the price they paid for it, in full by the end of the week. I'll correct the problems and get this train back on the tracks. I'll remove vendor fees, open the system up and run it all out of my pocket.
I'll leave a "tip" jar on the counter in case anyone feels the need.
You see, I made my first million by GIVING software away. It used to be called SHAREWARE. I never required anyone to pay anything. I encouraged everyone to give a copy to their friend. And you know what? It worked!
I'll make MM.NET Shareware. I'll make everyone happy again.
No hidden agendas, just friends.
You can PM me your offer.
john
M
MI2QWK4U
Guest
Thats a generous offer. I have to support anyone that makes an offer like thatl I will be the first in line for your tip jar John.
KillJoy
Sorry..... but my Give A Damn Broke..
Okay...I made it to page 4 of 8 before I had to reply to this thread.
Where to start???
First, from what I can tell, the new administration does not have a problem w/ TAF posting pictures. They DO have a problem when the pictures contain his company logo's and name. The simple solution, do not post pictures with these things.
Second, if Todd never posted his company or name, just said he was the "Exhaust Guy" would anyone know who Grand Muffler is? His name being posted IS advertising, wether it is intentional or not.
I do agree w/ the new admin. Todd's posting of pics THAT CONTAIN HIS COMPANY OR NAME should not occur unless he has a Vendor Status. It is simply not fair to the Supporting Vendors.
KillJoy
PS - Why are so many here who do not understand this the same one's who are not contributing members?
Where to start???
First, from what I can tell, the new administration does not have a problem w/ TAF posting pictures. They DO have a problem when the pictures contain his company logo's and name. The simple solution, do not post pictures with these things.
Second, if Todd never posted his company or name, just said he was the "Exhaust Guy" would anyone know who Grand Muffler is? His name being posted IS advertising, wether it is intentional or not.
I do agree w/ the new admin. Todd's posting of pics THAT CONTAIN HIS COMPANY OR NAME should not occur unless he has a Vendor Status. It is simply not fair to the Supporting Vendors.
KillJoy
PS - Why are so many here who do not understand this the same one's who are not contributing members?
B
bigslim
Guest
Wow John, you just went way up in my book. You have made the classiest move I have ever seen on this site. I too would put something in your tip jar.
RR|Suki
The Original Paxton
Maybe you should read Todd's post on page 7...
RR|Suki
The Original Paxton
B
bigslim
Guest
I don't understand and even have one more flag than you do.
KillJoy
Sorry..... but my Give A Damn Broke..
kj31067
p-71 to marauder
i am having a tough time comprehending the business strategy behind the moves of the last week or two.....i havent been around that long ,but i felt an almost immediate attraction to this site when i joined.. ever since the "thanks for the fish" thread , i have felt this site has been spinning clockwise down (or counter-clockwise depending on your hemisphere) the proverbial toilet... i dont get it..
too many changes too fast........we are still reeling from logans departure .christ, let the waves settle a little before you lay down the law for the new regime.....first we have mac s " my ball , my yard" routine for which i have still missed the apology i think the whole collective is due and now todd is on the spit....wtf ? the man was here probably before half of the new owners..(no research on that one, so fire away if i m wrong) .. he obviously had no monetary intentions in his ''on the rack'' series other than to share cool cars...i m getting the impression todd was doing a-ok financially
and didnt need to hustle back door deals through this site to eat..
i think his work speaks for itself and the man responsilble for it...
i'm seriously beginning to wonder if this is less about uniform compliance and more about $$$$$$$$$$... imho, the new owners of this site need to let the waves settle, however long that might take, and then slowly infuse changes and new ideas as well as deal with issues that they feel need attention....if i am out of line in
in an admin's opinon , do what you have to do....but at least take some advice.........
too many changes too fast........we are still reeling from logans departure .christ, let the waves settle a little before you lay down the law for the new regime.....first we have mac s " my ball , my yard" routine for which i have still missed the apology i think the whole collective is due and now todd is on the spit....wtf ? the man was here probably before half of the new owners..(no research on that one, so fire away if i m wrong) .. he obviously had no monetary intentions in his ''on the rack'' series other than to share cool cars...i m getting the impression todd was doing a-ok financially
and didnt need to hustle back door deals through this site to eat..
i think his work speaks for itself and the man responsilble for it...
i'm seriously beginning to wonder if this is less about uniform compliance and more about $$$$$$$$$$... imho, the new owners of this site need to let the waves settle, however long that might take, and then slowly infuse changes and new ideas as well as deal with issues that they feel need attention....if i am out of line in
in an admin's opinon , do what you have to do....but at least take some advice.........
kj31067
p-71 to marauder
where is the damn jar???? a little drama peaks your interest, this much sucks!!!!!!!!!!
mr.continental
A Motor City Original
If somebody posts a link to an ebay auction, a car for sale on Autotrader.com, etc, are they in violation of the rules?
- Status